Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0961

reference
828-tree-1
name
0961
tree-preservation-order

undefined

828-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.038780 50.873853)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.038723 50.873847,-1.038726 50.873858,-1.038733 50.873868,-1.038746 50.873876,-1.038762 50.873881,-1.038779 50.873883,-1.038797 50.873882,-1.038813 50.873877,-1.038825 50.873869,-1.038834 50.873859,-1.038837 50.873848,-1.038834 50.873837,-1.038826 50.873826,-1.038814 50.873818,-1.038798 50.873813,-1.038781 50.873811,-1.038763 50.873813,-1.038747 50.873818,-1.038734 50.873826,-1.038726 50.873836,-1.038723 50.873847)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL